View Single Post
Posts: 631 | Thanked: 1,123 times | Joined on Sep 2005 @ Helsinki
#199
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
To me one of the strongest arguments against 100% touch is the reduced lifespan of the overall product. With even normal usage, (at least parts of) the touchscreen will wear out long before the device in toto ceases to be useful.

So IMO the inclusion of some sort of additional hardware input device, regardless of form, is important-- and its open configurability paramount.
I would consider the device broken if the touch screen stops working. It's not like the space shuttle where you should have backup systems for everything if one system stops working.