It does seem irrelevant if you put it that way, but it probably became part of the conversation when it was pointed out that Nokia's decisions and posturing is becoming an impediment to attracting participation in open source directed at the maemo platform.
It seems, from my reading, as if it turned from a rallying 'how?' to a more boggled 'how?' It seems to have had the effect of questioning whether everyone's time and efforts are going to be worthwhile. Eiffel's comments appear to strike the nail on the head with his comments. Mind you, I'm also cynical by nature and I'm very happy when I'm proven wrong--but it seems as if that doesn't often happen. How do you or anyone else respond to that?
I'm not sure that I agree. Can you explain the problem that this illustrates? Are you suggesting that Nokia is completely irrelevant?
What can you suggest to get people more focused on the applications for maemo and less on Nokia's involvement?