View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#8
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I'm not sure what you mean by that. I was hoping to keep such comments out of the thread though. Feel free to PM me if you think I'm doing something wrong. I don't find oblique remarks like that helpful, though...
I wasn't trying to be oblique, or clever, or make "such" a comment. You've started a blog. You've had some thumbs. Now you're shouting about the rating system.

That's fine, and understandable. The best way to get involved in a cause is because it affects you personally (see the "scratching your own itch" bits of the community cohesiveness thread).

Also, if you followed any of the discussion you would have noted I was NOT referring to my posts, Jaffa, but those of others.
Don't be so trite. You've talked about both your posts and those of others in the other threads. This thread talks about neither, but the abstract.

[...]some of the posts "thumbed down" did indeed contain Maemo content, some indirect but some very specific.
This poll does not mention the content of specific posts. You asked how the thumb function should be viewed; most of the time I've seen things dramatically and consistently thumbed down are when a post contains no Maemo content at all. You asked for views as to how we think it should be used, that's a view.

I was also trying to extrapolate the view of how the "people"[1] view how it "should" be used. (FWIW, I think trying to pin down how it "should" be used is a hiding to nothing, and we're better off just understanding how people do use it).

Cheers,

Andrew

[1] "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it." Agent K, Men in Black (1997)
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: