I think this whole thread is about nothing. It does not matter what term Nokia marketing will use for the new tablet. The only thing that matters is the actual functionality of the device. For obvious corporate reasons, Quim can't disclose what the device will look or act like, so there is no point trying to make him violate his NDA. Also, words "pushing tablet paradigm forward" (aside from using the dreadful p-word) mean absolutely nothing from the technical point of view. They may mean that the tablet stays the tablet, only becomes better. On ther other hand, these words may also mean a different device that does not have much to do with the current tablet (like a Canola-like device). Trying to figure out what it will be is premature.