View Single Post
BrentDC's Avatar
Posts: 903 | Thanked: 632 times | Joined on Apr 2008
#302
Originally Posted by buhao View Post
OK, i decided to do some data collection after jmjanzen's last comment. I wanted to see if webkit made my bookmarks load faster. In my observation it seemed to render them a lot faster, but I wanted to check it out with a simple test. So i started with microb/gecko and loaded each of my bookmarks one at a time, closing the browser after each instance (i will call this a cold start). Then for my second test I went through them with the browser already open to see how much of it was the browser starting up (warm start). Then I did the same with Webkit enabled. Here is what I found. All observations are in seconds

webpage gecko (cold/warm) Webkit (cold/warm)

dealnews.com 50/40 55/50
reddit.com 15/10 17/10
maemo.org 20/12 17/12
engadget.com 50/45 28/21
wikipedia.org 12/8 12/8
internettablettalk.com 30/20 25/22
maps.google.com 55/45 35/26

I was a little shocked at the results. Webkit seemed so much faster in my day to day use. Maybe I was going to engadget and other javascript heavy pages more than my bookmarks, as it does seem to make a difference there.
How did you measure this? Did you do it by CPU usage (via something like load-applet) or just by the loading progress bar?

I ask this because Microb often is still loading the page after the progress bar goes away, while webkit on the other hand, removes the progress bar once the webpage has loaded completely. Could this explain things?

Edit: I just tested dealnews.com and the CPU was pegged at 100% for 18 seconds after Microb reported the website "Done Loading" by hiding the loading bar. Microb is cheating!

Last edited by BrentDC; 2009-01-16 at 23:07.