View Single Post
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#43
Originally Posted by epertinez View Post
So what? If maemo is going to replace symbian Symbian still have a long road before the last 10€ nokia phone runs the last S70 OS version. It makes total sense for me that Nokia forces Symbian to its limits like they did with N97 and then start moving people from Symbian team to maemo side.

Symbian's problem is the same that Windows Mobile problem. It never was indented to be a Computers operating system. Than means that it is not likely going to run in a multiprocessor computer or that it is never going to be able to talk with all printers in the market or many other things that linux-maemo can/could do right now.
Not sure how relevant the multiprocessor issue is yet, but it's probably true. (Neither could Linux, before 2.0... it's not impossible to add such stuff, especially if there were a relevant multiprocessor platform) As for printers, why in the world should Symbian not be able to talk to any printer over a network? Maemo, FWIW, can't either, because the functionality has been deliberately limited to that deemed suitable for a mobile device; adding printing support consists of adding a filters, and optionally a daemon, for either platform. The hard part is getting applications to integrate it, which applies equally to both.

iPhone runs on Darwin so they can do it. If Steve Jobs presents the next iPrint device which is a simple Wifi to USB device intended to connect any printer to your phone. How is Symbian going to counter attack? Linux runs in the main supercomputers around the globe and in few refrigerators. It is the best OS to run N99 because it is capable to do things that Symbian cannot.
But you haven't mentioned a shortcoming of Symbian that _prevents_ it from doing any of these except supercomputers; it seems you're arguing that it can't be made to do things because it hasn't been made to do them yet. Would you have argued in 2004 that Symbian could not support touchscreens, and they'd need a different OS for that?

For example: Imagine that while mobiles become more and more robust handheld computers, Apple invents their tablet which is a simple 12" screen you plug your iPhone into and becomes a bigger touchable computer.

Technically it is very easy for Apple to do so. Their software stack is used in notebooks that are attached to bigger screens when in office. Linux can do it too. And windows XP. But not Symbian. No program from symbian is resizable and surely symbian apis never considered such refresh possibility.
I'm no Symbian expert, but from what I know, I think you're seriously underestimating Symbian here. Remember, Symbian is the descendant of EPOC, which was developed for the Psion handhelds and netbooks.

I tend to agree that switching to Maemo is better eventually, but that's not because Maemo is more capable than Symbian, but because it uses existing portable components to attain the same capabilities; for example, we use X11 for display; this doesn't mean we can do some things that Symbian or Android can't, but it does mean we can run X11 apps with much less extensive porting.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: