View Single Post
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#23
Originally Posted by mobiledivide View Post
I guess I am one of the last people who doesn't download 'free music' from the internet. I am also very biased since I do some sound recording and mixing part time and so I see a lot of friends and acquaintances employed by the music industry losing their jobs and finding it more and more difficult to make a living from their formerly established careers.

I'm definitely not above the making my own questionable moves when it comes to downloading music (I capture my paid Rhapsody stream to play offline) but I truly believe that the free ride nature that is taking over music will really begin to hurt the art not just the top executives.

edit: I do realize that the argument in this thread is more about the "pipe" through which the data comes through, where there is definitely a grey area.
I've always taken the opposite view (though I do think some copyrights and patents are needed. Just not to the extent that they are today). But I don't produce music, I come from a science background which promotes sharing and remixing of ideas to produce new ones. If everyone in science acted like the music or movie industry, science would be nowhere near were it is today.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: