View Single Post
timsamoff's Avatar
Posts: 1,605 | Thanked: 1,601 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Southern California
#40
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
Forbidding the option of "no change" is an instance of those presently in power controlling the choices of those not in power.
I'd just like to interject that there's not really anyone "in power" or "not in power." There are just some people who have stronger opinions (and maybe louder voices) and those who don't. Some would call this a detriment of open communities and others would call it a benefit. If enough people call for "no change," then that's where it will stand.

Tim
__________________
http://samoff.com