View Single Post
mullf's Avatar
Posts: 610 | Thanked: 391 times | Joined on Feb 2006 @ DC, USA
#72
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Nope. You are still wrong. I will try to find the article that describes the situation.
You seriously think that a company has sued a person for having a gene that the company has patented??? Seriously??? Seriously?????? In the United States, human beings are not patentable.