It's obvious that FWTV works badly on some sites. Why should that be an argument against FWTV? It works brilliantly on other sites. That's the whole point: Have an arsenal of options available to be flexible enough to make the best possible web experience. I turn fwtv on and off as I jump from place to place, and I zoom up and down. Without those features I would tire of the whole thing and very probably stop browsing from my N800 at all.

Changing font size has been mentioned. Ok then. But can I expect a 'one size fits all' setting for this? Doesn't look like that to me, unless I override the fonts in the original web pages. Or will I have to use a menu to increase/decrease font sizes as I jump from page to page? Would that be an improvement from combining zoom with FWTV? Maybe it would, maybe not, but I don't know enough about how this is planned for the Fremantle browser.

For the record, I currently zoom up to 300% when using FWTV for some sites. The combo makes for just the right size (well, 270% would probably be optimal for those sites but the zoom steps are too high in my opinion - the next down is 240%. There's room for improvement in the zoom function here.)