View Single Post
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#60
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
There's nothing wrong with a general pocket computer without telephony. I'm just wondering why no one else is making them after four years of Nokia doing so.
I'd say the technology hasn't quite gotten to the point where it needs to be for a general purpose pocket computer to really do what people need it to do until now.

Intel's certainly pushing MIDs, Microsoft has Origami, and there are several companies pushing extremely powerful ARM SoCs that fall outside the range for smartphone devices. The big players see the potential in the market segment even if you don't. The netbook's dominance will be short lived. People don't want smaller laptops, they want something that fits in their pockets, and smartphones just don't cut it for browsing Facebook.

Originally Posted by krisse View Post
If a product's going to be successful, it has to either break into an existing market or find a new market. How can maemo 5 devices do either of those things if they stay pretty much the same as maemo 4 devices? What will change that will suddenly get people interested in the device?
Nokia's broken into the market, now they're ramping up to watch it explode.

The form factor may be similar, but the guts aren't even remotely comparable. An OMAP3 tablet is in a different universe from an OMAP2 tablet. It's got the guts to provide a smooth web experience, to be a powerful media player, to run those 3D games, and generally do everything one would expect a laptop to do, but also fits in your pocket.

Originally Posted by krisse View Post
The iPod Touch is cited on here as an example of a successful pocket computer, but most people don't buy it as a computer, they buy it as a media player.
. . . and what's preventing the Maemo 5 device from being that, too?
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: