View Single Post
Posts: 113 | Thanked: 13 times | Joined on Nov 2008 @ Darmstadt, Germany
#10
Originally Posted by fms View Post
It has less to do with the UI toolkit used than with the mastery of application programmers. Same things can be done with GTK+ or a bunch of other toolkits, as long as the author knows what he is doing.
Yeah, I also can paint the moon red to get some moody light for my next midnight photo session instead of just using a coloured spotlight. Of course I can modify the Look'n'Feel of other toolkits, too, but why bother with writing tons of additional code if I can just use the stuff that already comes with the toolkit AND is easy to use without tons of additional code?
What's your problem with Qt? Are they not "elite" enough for you tastes? Is your problem that they were not the first ones? Or do you fear that there are actually people that dont like GTK+ as much as you obviously do and might even use it to write good and usuable applications for the NITs?
You didn't offer ANY valid technical argument yet that supports your negative opinion. So if you don't have to add anything constructive to the discussion, why don't you just keep your opinion to yourself, so we can keep up a positive and constructive discussion here in this threat?