Faulty, as in it didn't ship with update server information and that information is apparently unavailable? . . .
It goes way beyond the OTA stuff, the software just isn't very well put together, it's not very pleasant to use and the platform isn't very good.
If this is the case, wherever the fault lies, it's still a problem with the phone (and thus Nokia's fully deserved failure in the US).
I'll believe it when I see it. But, really, how long has Symbian been around? It's taken them since when to get reasonable software distribution together?
The application distribution, installation and security system is user-hostile.
For-pay. Yeah, I'll wait for Fremantle's Modest, thanks. Be great if it worked, but it doesn't.
Bull. Almost all of Nokia's stuff is released in the US, it's just not often provided with contract.
I don't know how much travelling you do in the US (I'd guess not much judging by this statement), but the vast majority of metropolitan areas in the US have perfectly fine 3G coverage, and 2G coverage is acceptable elsewhere. Either way, comparing places like Europe and Japan to the US is silly. You guys don't have anywhere near the landmass to cover.