View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#46
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
Thank you!

And to Quim... Some times a cigar is just a cigar.

The root cause might actually be the reason this thread was created in the first place.

I thought it had to do with the responses on this forum by someone who purports to represent this community. I don't usually respond that way, you don't respond that way, most other members don't respond that way...

How can we as a community communicate to all that most find particular behaviors inappropriate and that they are NOT representative of the spirit, intent, or style of our community.

BTW I agree, it has nothing to do with whatever council a community member belongs to. I also know I am guilty of inappropriate responses at times. What isn't very clear to some is, when is that line crossed?
You are correct, and I'll provide the additional detail with another example.

There are a few outspoken members who have contributed heavily in the past and naturally find themselves in Contribution Limbo at present. I will adamantly toss the gauntlet at Nokia for this because I continue to believe that their hardware and software release schedules are counterproductive and even suicidal in a business sense (having worked there I can tell you with certainty that Nokia employees on the tail end of any release schedule are just as frustrated as you all are-- maybe more so). So they have a natural pent-up desire to DO SOMETHING with possibly no real outlet at present. This needs to be understood by council members when they respond to posts borne of frustration.

Ultimately it matters not how much power the council really has-- the perception creates its own reality. And when a given council member persistently beats up on a poster here for daring espouse a critical opinion that flies in the face of established dogma that goes well beyond what is acceptable IMO.

If anything, council representatives should be working to ensure protection against member abuse, NOT participating in it.

I'm not pulling that allegation out of thin air. If anyone wants hard examples, I can find them.

Back to my children... even as teens they're still blaming the victim when there's controversy. It's always the other guy who starts it. But conversation is 50-50; each particpator bears the responsibility for 1) making themselves clear, 2) actively listening to the other party, and 3) leaving quick judgment out of the exchange.

The council is a great idea. I'll bet no one remembers I championed the concept looong ago. It's just got off to a rough start in some ways and it loks like some leadership training would benefit a couple of members.

Bottom line: we need to allow and even foster dissent as long as it is well-reasoned and well-intended. Quit shutting down people like Penguinbait. I admit I used to have issues with him too, but every community needs a broad spectrum of input/feedback and if nothing else he represents one helluva devil's advocate when it's needed. Use that, learn from it, direct the energy to its best use-- DON'T clamp down on it. Try tolerance for a change.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: