View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#106
Originally Posted by lemmyslender View Post
I think it's just a communication issue in general whether it be the election, the forum reorg, or the redesign. I agree different communication types for different issues.
Thanks for this - it's been the most helpful to me post on the topic.

I don't want to get into specific "nit-picking" over what happened where, just to identify the types of issues that have arisen and how they can be addressed.

On the one, thing, though:

In the case of the forum redesign some of the comments *seemed* to me to indicate that some significant discussion took place other than in the forums (perhaps included in the redesign of maemo.org, then a semi-final product was introduced to the forum for testing/comment.
Hmm. You're half right: the redesign of maemo.org - as a whole - happened mainly through maemo-community, the wiki and IRC meetings. However, there was no discussion in those environments as to how talk would look (although there were discussions about particular elements which may have been used on talk - like a user header for download comments which had a requirement of being able to be reused elsewhere).

The redesign of the talk theme was entirely in Reggie's hands (within the overall look & feel) - just as all the other themes (which over the past 4 years have always been met by constructive criticism) have been.

Perhaps the council should have worked on pushing Reggie to deliver prototypes, mockups and plans - but that seems unfair to him when he a) always delivers; b) has the best interests of the community at heart; c) is doing this in his spare time and d) isn't employed by the community (as represented by the council).


Perhaps I am wrong on that point, but that's what it seems like happened to me. If I mis-understood some of the comments, I apologize. Just giving my impression of what happened.
Thanks - it's useful. No need to apologise for stating your understanding/impression; it's when people start stating such things as facts that I get frustrated.

For instance the following 2 quotes each started a thread relating to the most recent election. Neither mention maemo.org membership is/was required, so my assumption reading these is that I was not eligible to vote, as I hadn't received any email.
At that point, though, nothing you could have done would have made you eligible - as there's an account age limit to prevent ballot stuffing. And, as I said, trying to mobilise people about process before an election/referendum has proved to be impossible (see, for example, the threads on counting methods).

Now, we've already decided that "talk.maemo.org account" falls under the definition of "maemo.org account" as stated in the election process; so this shouldn't be an issue next time.

I also don't realize that I need a maemo.org login to be eligible in the future.
And that is a big problem. For which I can only apologise. I can promise that, as a council, we will take more care in our "official" communications for big, important, things like this in future.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: