View Single Post
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#4
Originally Posted by noventa98 View Post
In most cases the software that is reported as "fresh" is not new, just updated. Wouldn't it be preferable to have a "recently updated" section and a new (or "fresh") section for new stuff?
Well, we are not getting that many totally new packages, most updates are to existing packages, so personally I do not think this is worth it. A list of 10-15 freshly updated packages should suffice.

Also, the "hot" software has not changed for the past two or three months. After a while out does it still deserve the term "hot"? Maybe users (and developers) could appreciate to have some rotation.
Totally agree on this one. The packages on the Hot category list should be rotated daily, based on some semi-smart algorithm.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: