View Single Post
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#1277
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
So, the theory is that these additional capacities would be added and the device would be made smaller for no particular reason?

To me, the only real reason for doing this stuff would be because you're producing a phone.

So, I must have missed a point somewhere, sorry about that.

What would be the reason for these changes if the new device ISN'T a phone?
I'm for the N800-size screen, but even if it isn't a phone, making it more carryable is a plus (I'd really like a 7" screen on a flat 2" x 3" tablet ); it's not the sacrifice I would ask for, but it's not as if there's no point.

And maybe the phone capability is like the unannounced FM capability of the N800; maybe they just want to see what all the good geeks do with it.

Nonetheless, my guess is still that we're first getting a phone, not the Nokia unPhone©.


© 2009. Benson. All rights reserved.

Last edited by GeraldKo; 2009-06-14 at 00:58.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post: