View Single Post
Posts: 542 | Thanked: 117 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ 52 N, 6 E
#15
Originally Posted by qwerty12 View Post
Well, I detest MicroB too (and hated it even more when they introduced browserd) and much prefer Tear with its webkit. Tear does really show what this hardware can do.

But Nokia could only work with what they had hardware-wise at the time, can't blame 'em for that. Won't argue with you about MicroB though.
But. MicroB is slow but shows virtually all webpages. Others like Tear are too beta (i.e it crashes at some webpages or does not display it properly). I did not see any browser running on a Nokia phone (e.g. 5800) which displays so many webpages properly. MicroB has a changeable user agent which allows you to see the full web pages of some sites which show only limited WAP content on phone browsers.
And I agree an internet device should be supplied with a faster browser.

Last edited by skatebiker; 2009-06-25 at 06:55.