View Single Post
timsamoff's Avatar
Posts: 1,605 | Thanked: 1,601 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Southern California
#1468
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
So your argument backs up the notion that the rep is correctly communicating the company line. The argument falls back to PR and executive management, who decided to keep such things as "secret." Some would argue that they've not been very successful in communicating to customers or maintaining interest in the new device in the face of increasing competition, in addition to previous terrible hardware support experiences with the other Nokia products so far. (Go ahead.. see if you can get a replacement kickstand.) :P
This is true -- and it happens everyday within big corporations.

I was doing the multimedia for internal training material pertaining to new products and services for the company I used to work at. Sometimes new P&S were coming down the line and even we -- who should have been educating our sales associates about such new things -- were not given access to information that would have been very useful in stores. Sometimes the first time we'd get to see a new product in order to shoot photos or video of it for the training material would be when we went into a store when the product launched and shot it in the store. No kidding.

Needless to say, the salespeople knew less than we did at this point.

On a related note, what do you think Apple sales reps told people about the iPhone if they got calls about it pre-launch. Probably that they didn't even know what it was. As a matter of fact, many of my friends who work at Apple stores denied the iPhone even days before it was announced.

Tim
__________________
http://samoff.com
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post: