View Single Post
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#11
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Whether Nokia should pay for the summit to be in the US one year should be a purely numbers based decision based on sales volumes and likely attendee base.
One more time, to clarify: if the Summit is organized in the US then anybody living in a country lacking the "visa waiver" status with the US has only 30-70% chance of getting a visa to attend the summit. This includes many Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Serbia, etc.), Latin American countries, Turkey, etc. Two possible scenarios are (1) refusal to issue a visa based on suspicions that the applicant is going to stay in the US, and (2) delaying visa issue until it loses relevancy. This, not the cost, and not the stupid fingerprinting thing, is going to be one of the main reasons against organizing the Summit in the US.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: