View Single Post
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#19
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@Laughing man: The kicker with Apple's iPhone\Touch closed system is that it gives great payout to good developers. This is a substantial difference that I don't think can be replicated by non financial oriented open system.

What good would an open system be, if it's lacking software?
When I wrote my above post there was two methods of open and closed i referenced. The first we think of is like maemo versus iPhone. Windows versus Linux. The second is Windows based computers versus Apple's Macs. Where both are considered closed if you use Linux but you can use Windows on more computers than you can OSX.

What is the benefit of the latter? Simple a bigger audience. You can make X dollars given a deal with Apple with the Y number of iPhone users. Or X dollars given the userbase of Y number of whatever OS which is found on alot more phones.

Right now it's in Apple's court but if it's anything like the PC market an "open" competitor that allows their OS to be used on more types of devices is going have more of a userbase, hence a bigger market to sell too. Right now all of Apple's competitors are still growing (Android being slowly adopted for more and more phones) or like Windows Mobile who have been slacking till Apple came on the scene.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...