View Single Post
VDVsx's Avatar
Posts: 1,070 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki
#40
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Does anyone disagree with the premise of my prioritisation (whether it's a series of rules applied or the guidelines which subjective judges use as a starting point)?

Is there a concrete alternative proposal other than "some people should review them all and pick which ones they want"?
IMO your rules are pretty sane, but I also agree with the majority of Quim's thoughts, and also it will not be that hard to select ~80% of the sponsored participants. For the others a case by case evaluation following the proposed guidelines is needed.
__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org