I would have agreed; if the developers actually delivered something regularly for the platform.

They didn't. They waited for the fixes, they're coming in Fremantle. Those fixes will be temporary, on it's way to Harmattan.

It has more to do with user perception simply because the developers didn't do **** this iteration and are going to be limited in the next iteration.

As a developer, I had to wait for Adobe Flex to go from headache 1.0/1.01 to semi-usable 1.5 to worthwhile 2.0, quickly replaced with 3.0 and presently beta-testing 4.0 and not finding myself looking backwards.

Yet, I had to deliver each and every step. Is my view skewed? Of course. But to push any type of discussions under the rug with blanket, self-fulfilling statements like "it's a developer problem", "it'll make sense in the future", "you'll change your mind with the press releases"... seriously. That's a call of faith.

No prior product or support to have faith in, that creates bad perception... by developer and user alike.

Only fanboys and hopefuls will fall into line. And to treat skeptics with such disregard... alarming. Each view is worth discussion.

Sorta what a forum is all about. Seems like a few of you people want no discussion, just a group of sheep instead.

Again, perception.