View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#87
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
Sorry, I wasn't trying to cherry pick or axle wrap(?), nor was I arguing just to argue, but when talking about life forms in regards to "future proof" or evolution, isn't it fair to assume the concept of environment is implied? Didn't I use that word in my last response?
Right, which is exactly why I was confused!

And while the concept of environment may well be implied in any such treatment, there's always he question of "how much". Every animal has its niche and tolerance ranges. If we're pushed too far out of ours, yet a potential competitor still finds room to survive or even thrive, then we will have to move aside and call it quits whether we like it or not. And our sociosuicidal tendencies seem to be pushing for just such a scenario.

But now we're getting VERY off topic...

EDIT: hey, I apologize if I came across as combative. Not intended. just battling a headache...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2009-08-04 at 23:14.