View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#208
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@Texrat:
What do you mean by "when those (device costs) are invisible to consumers"?
Are you referring to the portion of the device price embedded into the contract price?
This is another "for all practical purposes thing".

Let's say the typical US consumer has two choices:

1) an unlocked phone for $600 paid upfront + service plan;

2) locked phone for "free" but actually costs them $800, spread out over a contract

By and large option 2 will be selected. That's just the way it works here. And the really funny thing is, many people opting for choice #2 will subsequently seek to unlock their phone after they get it.

The point is that cost is *almost* a moot point of any discussion involving US cell phones and users. For the most part they're very programmed by the status quo. It all comes down to "what can it do?"
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: