View Single Post
Mara's Avatar
Posts: 1,310 | Thanked: 820 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Irving, TX
#210
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
This is another "for all practical purposes thing".

Let's say the typical US consumer has two choices:

1) an unlocked phone for $600 paid upfront + service plan;

2) locked phone for "free" but actually costs them $800, spread out over a contract

By and large option 2 will be selected. That's just the way it works here. And the really funny thing is, many people opting for choice #2 will subsequently seek to unlock their phone after they get it.

The point is that cost is *almost* a moot point of any discussion involving US cell phones and users. For the most part they're very programmed by the status quo. It all comes down to "what can it do?"
I want to add that in the US there is virtually no possibility to sign up for a phone service contract without long term commitment... and they all come with a (locked) phone included. Only some prepaid plans you can buy a phone with full price and pay the minutes you use, but for heavy users they are not an option due to significantly higher cost per minute. (I personally have had prepaid account for years that works good for me. I do not use my personal cell much...)

Only if there was possibility to sign up for month to month service only (without phone), and if those were priced cheaper than the contract packages (with phone), then there would be some market for unlocked phones.

Last edited by Mara; 2009-08-07 at 20:17.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mara For This Useful Post: