View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#67
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
The ideal scenario is to offer easy tools for developing simple stuff in the surface, easier tools to develop applications in the native environment and also powerful tools to allow platform developers to come with those rare wonders.
Yep, that's what I was thinking too. Even a simpler cross-compiler toolchain without any kind of cpu transparency would be useful for most native applications -- save for ports of already existing GNU packages, mostly have no need of overly long "configure"s requiring complete sbox-like environment (and thus can work in a cross-compile env that can't run compiled binaries). Then a simpler buildpackage tool (written in standard portable C) could do the job of creating the .deb file; it just needs to tar the appropriate files.
(See the iPhone GNU toolchain for examples)

Of course the debugging/emulation issue is still there, and sbox should be still there in case the need for anything more complex arises.

Last edited by javispedro; 2009-08-16 at 15:14.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: