View Single Post
yerga's Avatar
Posts: 696 | Thanked: 1,012 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Asturies, Spain
#6
Originally Posted by fpp View Post
Are memory use and APIs the main reasons why they created a new project ? Why not evolve PyQt instead ?...
I would say the license it's the most important part. PySide is LGPL (you can write open software or closed), while PyQt is GPL or you have to pay to Riverbank if you want write a closed-source application.
http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/...e/pyqt/license

In PySide FAQ:
What about PyQt?

Nokia’s initial research into Python bindings for Qt involved speaking with Riverbank Computing, the makers of PyQt. We had several discussions with them to see if it was possible to use PyQt to achieve our goals. Unfortunately, a common agreement could not be found , so in the end we decided to proceed with PySide.
Edit: VDVsx was faster ;-)
__________________
Daniel Martín Yerga
maemo.org profile
Twitter
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yerga For This Useful Post: