Textrat, now, you're being dramatic. I always support respectful protest. Envicta's comments (regardless of the tone) are correct. Nokia is only interested in N800 development and is doing what they can to secure it.

We all understand the interests of a commercial company and we don't expect Nokia to be different. They have every right not to provide OS2007 on 770. But they have the obligation of fixing the bugs and improving features of OS2006.

I've talked about this in many messages, so, I don't repeat, only stating that if they sell an "Internet Tablet", then, they have to provide stable and compliant Internet experience on the device. While much improved, but still this is not the case 0n 770. For example, if fixing browser bugs on 770 means a new version of Opera (and licensing costs), then, Nokia has to do it; this is not Flash 9 upgrade. My iPod example again; Apple can state this device doesn't support WMA (as a media format), but can't say this device will sometimes play music and some other times won't.

If Nokia doesn't fix 770 bugs (on OS2006 or by providing OS2007) and we quietly accept, then, this will repeat with every new generation of Nxxx.