View Single Post
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#261
Originally Posted by Rebski View Post
Funny, a short while back weren't we insisting that it was a matter of physical specification? e.g. a screen bigger than 3.5".
This is not just my view but appeared to be the consensus on the forum esp. when comparison was being made to the iPhone.
Where does that 3.5" figure come from? Who decided on it?

Whoever did decide on it did so as a matter of taste, because there's no significant functional difference between a 3.6" screen and a 3.4" screen.