View Single Post
Posts: 39 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Tampere, Finland
#42
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
Samsung reckon sub-$100 Android phones will be hitting the market in 2010. So the N900, is it overpriced? Absolutely - I can get a full laptop for less than the price of an N900! The N900 is, technically (and very loosely) a shrunken N810 with phone module and updated OMAP processor... can the smaller size and phone module justify double the price? I don't believe it can. The economics of the smartphone market will soon be redefined when the cheap and highly functional Android touchscreen phones start to appear, and I look forward to that happening as this is price gouging, pure and simple.

And while the N900 may be priced on the assumption it will be subsidised by the network operators, as I and many others buy our phones SIM-free we are getting well and truly shafted.

I'm disappointed the N900 wasn't priced as something of a loss leader to be honest, but I guess Nokia has to avoid undercutting their old pieces of sh1t, like the N97.
The market is not going to change too much when it comes to prices. High-end devices are high-end devices. If you want better CPU, you pay more. If you want better camera module with better lense, you pay more. If you want better build quality, you pay more. Etc.

If you want $100 smartphone, you're welcome to choose cheap Symbian or cheap Android phone, but there's a reason why the prices are low.

It's totally stupid to compare laptop prices and phone prices. Apples and oranges.
And btw. your N810 doesn't have e.g. a 5MP Carl Zeiss camera.