View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#93
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
Two different Games...

The Game US carriers have been playing with subscribers; and... the Game US carriers want device manufacturers to play.

The first game manufacturers have little say in but they do affect the outcome... As was said earlier, in some cases when manufactures competed with each other over a carriers business, the manufacturer often came up with ways that a carrier could squeeze extra pennies out of a subscriber. Notice the term “carriers business” and not subscribers business. This is the outcome of this subsidized device game.

The subscriber is not the customer, the carrier is.
The more I wanted to refute this... I simply cannot. You hit it on the head in a way that I wasn't really thinking about.

However, there's only one problem I have. Nokia hasn't been playing any of these carrier games for a while. In fact, the offerings from Nokia that are indeed subsidized that are worth a darn are far and few between in the US.

In fact, it's been stated before. It just seems like Nokia gave up on the US market.

Will the N900 be a game changer... for Nokia perhaps? They'll sit back down at the table with the carriers and work with them, not away from them?

But... your words. You got me thinking.