I agree about not liking the strategy. But that's not the value of the article, to me. The value of the article is that Nokia has finally given us their definition of Symbian vs Maemo, and how they plan to market them. Just a few months/weeks ago, I was complaining about Nokia's rather confusing stance about what role Maemo plays in their strategy.

I think that stance is now clear. And I'm glad for that.

I don't think it's the best stance, but at least now we know what it is, and what role Maemo plays in it.