View Single Post
BaKSo's Avatar
Posts: 78 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Melbourne
#18
Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
Well, if something coming out in 2011 wouldn't be better than something coming out in 2009, then you would have some serious issues on your hands.
Christ said:
And in my opinion, a device ready for launch should impress with its OS much better than a device 2 years away from possible production. He was impressed by the software, not the hardware. That intrigues me like big time. I hope Maemo is up to the task.

the question is whether the Device, that eldar reviewed is better in hardware of software?

in the case of hardware it SHOULD and MUST be better because it may have some hardware that is not available when N900 was planned. it is unfair to compare this device hardware with N900

in case of sofware it depends whether the Samsung device was presented to Eldar in vision/concept underdevelopment software (the possible future software) which SHOULD be better than current N900 software (since it will be realeased in 2011) and it is only a concept or vision,

OR

The software is already available now, Eldar already use it (hands on) when he reviewed it and it is really good and better than Maemo 5, which THEN it may be a problem from Maemo and N900 because looking at the time frame (2011) if the software is already better than N900 now, in 2011 it will be much much better...

still i think comparing a device that will be released in 2009 and 2011 is not fair...