View Single Post
Posts: 452 | Thanked: 522 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#115
Originally Posted by karatchov View Post
Personally, I'm using maemo-sdk+ with sb2, and I'm very happy with it, and it supposed to correct many of sb1 problems.

So, what do you think about it ? do you think it's worth an install script inside your vm ?
I had heard about SB2, but hadn't investigated it. Since SB1 is the currently "supported" method.

I think I've answered my own question, about why to use SB2. First of all I found out the most recent version of QT supports SB2 targets!!!! SWEEETTTTT!!!! That will simplify things DRASTICALLY, for implementing QTCreator support! It should make cross-compiling much easier to get implemented! Second, because SB2 uses the main OS's binaries, you eliminate a huge amount of wasted disk space and un-needed installation time.

I'm going to play with it and if it works as well as it seems to, I will probably ditch the SB1 and go fully with SB2 so that I can get QT support much easier.

Nathan.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan For This Useful Post: