@Laughing Man: Yes and in that sense I also think Apple made a good call with their UI. They redesigned it for one hand use without stylus that makes 90% of my daily usecases just 'better' on it.. so, like you said, everything just fits together well. @sachin: yes, actually I'm looking forward to trying out the N900's screen because I saw in one of the video that Peter@Maemo said he prefers to use the N900 WITHOUT A STYLUS and that he's been using it that way for some time. So yeah, the best case for me would be if the screen can behave as sensitive and responsive as a capacitive screen for 90% of my daily usage scenario (one handed use) and if for some reason I need to manipulate very small objects on the screen with high precision, the I have the option to take out the stylus. Not having multitouch is ok, AS LONG AS THE ALTERNATIVE CONTROLS ARE SANE. Looking at the nipple twirls for browser zoom, I haven't been that impressed. It's the same gesture used in HTC browsers... but, whatever, no big deal, as long as they implement double-tap-to-zoom-to-div-width properly. I do have slight reservation about N900's high resolution screen. I've owned the Toshiba G900 which has a 3.2" 800x480 screen. Yes, it's the same resolution as NIT and N900, and even smaller.... and at 3.2" it's kind of pointless to have that much detail. You'd have to squint and look at small things closer, which lessens the comfort from usability point of view. Higher resolution also means = high resource requirements. This means CPU, GPU and Drive space consumption (the graphic assets are bigger in general?).