View Single Post
Posts: 452 | Thanked: 522 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#125
Originally Posted by SubCore View Post
i'm glad to hear that i have given you new ideas

the beauty about using qtcreator from the VM is that you only have to set DISPLAY in the project's run environment to :2.0 and hit Run, instead of having to worry about syncing two repositories.

and it's not much slower, at least as far as i can tell.
i am currently at a stage where i'm trying to get my bearings, since i have no experience with C++ yet. i come from the "easy" side (java/.net) so im only doing very basic stuff wich doesn't compile long

in any case, the main issue is the speed of the virtual machine, if it's usable inside it's most likely gonna work over a remote X on the VM host. that's just a little more overhead (different story for graphic-intense projects of course)
i'm using it on a pentium 4 and find it usable for what little i am doing, and that's an ancient CPU in todays terms
Actually VJ speed is pretty good on my machine; I just hate the mouse "grab" issue. And it would be nice to use QT outside the VM to do all the development.

Rsync would sync the source code very quickly; probably be un-noticeable.

Display; all I have to do is grab the machines ip and pass that into the vm, so it would be ip:2.0 (if I recall correctly). So that shouldn't be an issue either.

Nathan