View Single Post
deadmalc's Avatar
Posts: 415 | Thanked: 182 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Leeds UK
#355
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
This has been discussed endlessly on #maemo, and much smarter people than myself preferred ext3 (including Nokia, it appears). Observation of flash memory survival rates (nearly 100% in what I've observed) seems to bear this out.

I'll stick to ext3, thanks.
It would be interesting to keep an eye on btrfs, that supposedly has an option "optimised" for flash devices - what ever the hell that means (in terms of real world performance) I don't really know.

Not exactly up to date or reliable info but
http://markmail.org/message/nnjqocag3hildwyz
interesting nevertheless

and from wiki http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.p...zed_for_SSD.3F
__________________
Life on the edge....always waiting to fall

Last edited by deadmalc; 2009-09-21 at 07:43.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to deadmalc For This Useful Post: