Thread: N900 Specifications
View Single Post
attila77 is offline attila77
2009-09-21 , 09:19
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#359
Originally Posted by deadmalc View Post
It would be interesting to keep an eye on btrfs, that supposedly has an option "optimised" for flash devices - what ever the hell that means (in terms of real world performance) I don't really know.
I don't think that has to do much with wear. On eMMC devices, there are so many layers between you and the actual device it's quite pointless to 'try' to do wear leveling yourself. That said, filesystems COULD be more flash friendly by taking into account flash block sizes, no head seek time, etc.