View Single Post
Posts: 271 | Thanked: 220 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#26
Originally Posted by exon View Post
As a cancer researcher, I'm unable to resist de-lurking for a bit of Friday afternoon pedantry.
...
That being said, I've never seen any reliable data to support a radiation->cancer link.
To take the pedantry a step further...I assume you mean you've never seen any reliable data to support a link between cancer and radiation of non-ionizing energies, specifically the frequencies typically used in modern mobile phone communications? 'Cause I think I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with you there if you meant that statement literally as you wrote it (As will hundreds of thousands of folks involved in various atomic/nuclear attacks, experiments, and accidents over the decades).