View Single Post
R-R's Avatar
Posts: 739 | Thanked: 242 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montreal
#67
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Perhaps a 4b) would be to suggest the automatic opening up of EOL-d components by a defined procedure (or was that what you meant?).
Exactly, I'm really on Korbé's side on this but I can understand the Chinese ripoff argument...

How about: Nokia makes an ethical/public notice saying that we will release FOSS version 1 year from the binary for very specific bleeding edge stuff... That doesn't solve the trust issue but at least it gives us confidence that they really are doing it to preserve their research/market advantages and nothing else.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to R-R For This Useful Post: