View Single Post
Posts: 631 | Thanked: 1,123 times | Joined on Sep 2005 @ Helsinki
#90
Originally Posted by cristids View Post
What is there to understand? While I totally agree that nokia is entitled to release closed source in their own device featuring maemo, I only sanctioned a phrase that is totally wrong. Then ruskie also came in with his claim and I was responding to him with my last statement.
So again, ragnar's statement was wrong and so was ruskies. That is all.
I replied already, but I'll reply again. I used my words incorrectly.

I meant that when maemo.nokia.com talks about an "open source operating system", it doesn't mean that it is 100% open source.

It is more of a statement like "This is an environmentally friendly product", i.e. that is something that has much environmentally friendly aspects. A statement of general intent rather than a statement of being 100% free.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ragnar For This Useful Post: