View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#213
Originally Posted by zerojay View Post
Do you remember the professional movie critic that decided he would download an unfinished workprint edition of a movie (Hulk, maybe Wolverine) and reviewed it even though the special effects were completely missing?

He got canned.
Zerojay, you ignorant slut.

First, the movie he DOWNLOADED ILLEGALLY OFF THE INTERNET to review was 'Wolverine'.

Secondly, he got canned for publishing a SELF-INCRIMINATING ARTICLE where he admitted to ILLEGALLY DOWNLOADING A COPY OF THE MOVIE OFF THE INTERNET. Not, as you attempted to allude, for pointing out that the effects were missing.

ref:
http://arstechnica.com/media/news/20...ata-center.ars
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/17471.cfm
http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog...ne-piracy.html
yawn... I'm sure you could google up more sites that clarify the point.

There were plenty of opportunities for you to site as examples of poor reviews getting people canned--but that wasn't one of them.

[vapid smile as he shuffles his papers]

(Note: ZJ, no personal assault intended, I was parodying the style of Saturday Night Live's editorial 'he said, she said' debate segments) ^.^;

Last edited by danramos; 2009-09-25 at 05:12.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: