View Single Post
zerojay's Avatar
Posts: 2,669 | Thanked: 2,555 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#4
Originally Posted by kanzlr View Post
this is a thread in response to this:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=32050

Screen rotation introduces a lot of problems, and I would like to state why I am very happy that there is no screen rotation on the N900. I say this from the standpoint of a developer AND user:

screen rotation introduces a lot of extra work in the UI department. I've written Android apps before, and you basically have to design two UIs. You have to test two UIs and you have to think about how you integrate them in your app to play well.

testing = 30% of the whole development cycle. if I have to increase my testing twofold (or maybe not by a factor of two, but still) I have to put more work into the whole project.
Designing the UI takes quite some work. If I have to do it twice, it is twice as much work.

and from a usability perspective, it does one of the worst things you can do: it creates an inconsistent user experience.

we all are geeks, and we like features and things to show off, but auto screen rotation is not the WTG.

the Android G1 does it at least right in the usability department, as it only rotates when you slide open the keyboard. that makes sense for the user. But the Palm Pre is even better here in not disrupting the user experience and usability.

so, please, no autorotation, no rotation at all, thanks.
While I'm not against having rotation as a feature (even though I would rarely use it), what I am against is having Nokia resources and community programmers work towards "making stuff turn" instead of working on more new applications, bug fixes and new ideas. That's my main issue.

Originally Posted by kanishou View Post
To quote from that thread:
Fair enough.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to zerojay For This Useful Post: