View Single Post
Posts: 716 | Thanked: 303 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sheffield, UK
#174
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
True, but if you're using N900 in corporate environment the freedom is quite attractive. It is also possible to vote with your money as consumer, just a bit harder. That is why I endorse a donation-based system where the users like you and me, being part of community, can vote with their wallet. Because sometimes a feature or a bugfix is worth some money.
I totally agree in that case.

I would happily donate to any project that is going to deliver a feature I want or even that already has. The trouble is, if you donate to an open source project there is a chance the developer will get bored or real work will get in the way.

Commercial on the other hand, it IS their real work so you pay them to implement a feature, they better do it. They also generally have more resources to throw at it and will not just do "the fun/interesting" bits, which any developer doing it as a hobby is likely to do.

Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
Yes, OSS also supported sound cards which ALSA did not support. X.Org also still does not fully support some graphics cards. It is all a matter of 1) developer itch or financial incent 2) rarity of hardware or feature. If PA or KDE4 or ALSA doesn't cut it for you, you use the predecessor (legacy software) instead. There is nothing wrong with that, and there is nothing wrong with running an old, stable version of an OS. I also gave PA as example because it supports audio over network seemingly. There is no such thing for OSX or Windows, while PA is ported to OSX and Windows.
The thing is, I can't get it to work how it used to as they expect you to do it their way or be an ALSA GURU who knows how to hack it to work how you want. Granted Windows you might not even be able to change its behaviour at all, but then they are unlikely to release with the functionality missing like PA has.