View Single Post
R-R's Avatar
Posts: 739 | Thanked: 242 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montreal
#178
Originally Posted by Alex Atkin UK View Post
You lock it down you gain a competitive advantage. You buy yourself a few months leeway while they are hacking away trying to clone your device.

As was said earlier, if you don't do that they may even release a clone product before the official product itself launches.
I do not agree on this part but I've already said enough on the subject...

Originally Posted by Alex Atkin UK View Post
I do not necessarily agree with the Release Early, Release Often for all software though. For one I wish KDE 4 had not come out until it was up to standard with KDE 3. Too many distros have adopted KDE 4 and practically dropped KDE 3, when 4 is just not ready yet. Had it not been "released early" they would have stuck with 3 that bit longer and avoided the ton of teething problems people have with 4.

I get it, you need people to test it. But surely there are plenty enough people willing to risk early software rather than forcing it onto an unwilling public. But this is getting off topic.
Well, R.E.R.O. has nothing to do with bad naming/numbering choices...

It's all about giving access to the software early so to get as many eyes as possible on the code and fix things.
It's definitely not branding alpha version as final 4.0.0 product ready to be shipped! If KDE ****ed up, it's totally unrelated! :/
 

The Following User Says Thank You to R-R For This Useful Post: