View Single Post
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#97
Originally Posted by lemmyslender View Post
Really seriously, that's when I start worrying. Usually, when I hear phrases like that, it's from a salesman, and I walk away. In my experience, "don't worry" means start looking around, it won't work like you're being led to believe.
Your cynicism is certainly productive.

Originally Posted by lemmyslender View Post
As my-symbian pointed out there are many ways this might become a problem for a typical user.
. . . and as I've tried to point out, we've been working to ensure that it wont be.

Originally Posted by lemmyslender View Post
Tell me that any app that gets through Extras QA has a hard limit on the total size of files it can install or (at some later point) write in /. Tell me that a user will have to jump through multiple warnings and hoops to install a 3rd party repository. Even given all that, some users will blindly click and install anything from anywhere.
These users are an extreme minority, you make it sound as if every 3rd user is going to install 500 200KB packages or 100MB of 3rd-party packages from a non-Extras source. This is essentially absurd. Even with the more pressing limits of the N800 and N810, only a very small minority of users ever really hit the wall with space limitations.

We're working to prevent this from multiple angles. I'm not trying to sweep it under the rug, but given the work that's been going on to deal with the limits, it's certainly not a severe enough issue to make it appropriate material for a product preview where the majority of readers will not be equipped to understand the warning and head it appropriately. The likely reaction is going to be "Man, I don't want to buy this if it's only got 65MB of space for stuff." rather than, "Ah, there should be plenty of application space available, I just need to be careful about where I get my applications from." and that doesn't help anybody.

Originally Posted by lemmyslender View Post
I'm just saying that it's there so we shouldn't ignore it, otherwise there'll be a new thread every week where someone did something stupid and filled up / because they weren't worried about checking it.
Unless we insert a long explanation about /opt, NAND memory and eMMCs into every preview and review that gets released? I think not.
__________________
Ryan Abel

Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2009-09-30 at 19:53. Reason: Type/clarification
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: