View Single Post
eiffel's Avatar
Posts: 600 | Thanked: 742 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ England
#60
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
...What we are saying is that no matter what user will have access to new Maemo flagship devices unlocked, at least through the official Nokia distribution channels...
Provided that remains true in the future, then we have no problems.

Originally Posted by qgil View Post
...if someone voluntarily signs a contract with an operator for a locked-in device and voluntarily purchases DRM apps or content, then I don't see what ownership and freedom rights can he really claim.
Fair comment, if the user genuinely understands what's going on (which is often not the case when carriers cripple a product).

I would really like to see Nokia require carriers to use a different model number (or at least a suffix) when they provide a device with different functionality compared to the device provided directly by Nokia. At the moment, some carriers do this anyway, and some don't.

Regards,
Roger
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to eiffel For This Useful Post: