View Single Post
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#6
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
What the article says is that the laptop OEMs balked at the extra cost - not Intel and certainly not Nokia decided not to do it.
As I said, there was no business case for Intel/Nokia - if the OEMs don't want it, why waste resources designing/building something you can't sell?

Anyway, don't take it from me - it's a direct quote from a Nokia spokeswoman here.

Last edited by Milhouse; 2007-02-15 at 22:48.