View Single Post
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#93
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
This is very interesting. Apple fanboys will just say that nokia is worried about apple's success. I would think the same.... if not why not bring thnis suit up earlier?

I hope apple loses
Perhaps they tried to cross-license (multi touch related perhaps) and the romance just didn't work out. Perhaps Nokia legal team researched they actually deserve to cross-license, and found for example prior art on some of their patents. Which others have found too. We just never know, at this stage at least. At least we know Nokia is not a patent farm.

Originally Posted by DaveP1 View Post
Now because the N900 is coming out. I suspect some part of the N900 hardware or of Maemo 5 may require an Apple license and a cross licensing deal could not be worked out.

If it's related to Maemo 6 and multitouch, the only reason to do it now instead of later is to introduce FUD regarding the iPhone while the N900 initially shows up in stores.
Or to save yourself from FUD later... Apple is constantly FUDding about jailbreak and multi-touch. They even claimed for a long time Mac OS X is UNIX.

Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
I predict the outcome will be:

1) a nominal payment from Apple to Nokia to cover past infringement
2) a license sharing agreement that lets the iPhone move forward as is, and lets Nokia utilize iPhone-isms for things like Multi-touch.

And, I'm pretty sure #2 is the hold-up in the negotiations, not #1. I bet Apple has a death-grip on preventing other manufacturers (esp. one as big as Nokia) from having a multi-touch experience that's comparable to the iPhone.
Agreed, seems a plausible explanation.

Originally Posted by vkv.raju View Post
In this same thread earlier it was mentioned that Apple was sued for using multi-touch in their devices. So, it is not their patent.
Being sued does not mean you're guilty.

Originally Posted by gskimmel View Post
Not quite. I work in patent litigation and while I have not read the complaint yet (I plan to), the press release said that Nokia is suing Apple for infringement. That means in the complaint Nokia has identified certain patents that they claim Apple is infringing upon. If it was a matter of Nokia's patent applications being refused because of Apple's patents that would be an issue to be taken up in the US Patent and Trademark Office, not a federal district court.
Yes the exact same happened with Sun vs NetApp. Pre-emptive strike or something.

Originally Posted by frals View Post
Aktiebolag is swedish for "joint-stock corporation" (literal translation pretty much) which is in Sweden what Ltd is in the UK
Like MySQL AB

Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
The irony of both paragraphs is killing me.
You're forgetting the third party: the lawyers
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!